32 research outputs found

    Impaired integration of object knowledge and visual input in a case of ventral simultanagnosia with bilateral damage to area V4

    Get PDF
    In this study we report some of the first evidence showing how brain-damage can affect the underlying processes that support the integration of sensory input and prior knowledge during the visual perception of shape. We report the case of patient MT with an acquired ventral simultanagnosia following posterior occipito-temporal lesions encompassing V4 bilaterally. Despite showing normal object recognition for single items, and intact low-level vision, MT was impaired in object identification with overlapping figures displays.Task performance was modulated by familiarity: unlike controls, MT was faster with overlapping displays of abstract shapes than common objects. His performance with overlapping common object displays was also influenced by both the semantic relatedness and visual similarity of the display items. These findings challenge claims that visual perception is driven solely by feedforward mechanisms, and show how brain-damage can selectively impair high-level perceptual processes supporting the integration of stored knowledge and visual sensory input

    Optic Flow Stimuli in and Near the Visual Field Centre: A Group fMRI Study of Motion Sensitive Regions

    Get PDF
    Motion stimuli in one visual hemifield activate human primary visual areas of the contralateral side, but suppress activity of the corresponding ipsilateral regions. While hemifield motion is rare in everyday life, motion in both hemifields occurs regularly whenever we move. Consequently, during motion primary visual regions should simultaneously receive excitatory and inhibitory inputs. A comparison of primary and higher visual cortex activations induced by bilateral and unilateral motion stimuli is missing up to now. Many motion studies focused on the MT+ complex in the parieto-occipito-temporal cortex. In single human subjects MT+ has been subdivided in area MT, which was activated by motion stimuli in the contralateral visual field, and area MST, which responded to motion in both the contra- and ipsilateral field. In this study we investigated the cortical activation when excitatory and inhibitory inputs interfere with each other in primary visual regions and we present for the first time group results of the MT+ subregions, allowing for comparisons with the group results of other motion processing studies. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated whole brain activations in a large group of healthy humans by applying optic flow stimuli in and near the visual field centre and performed a second level analysis. Primary visual areas were activated exclusively by motion in the contralateral field but to our surprise not by central flow fields. Inhibitory inputs to primary visual regions appear to cancel simultaneously occurring excitatory inputs during central flow field stimulation. Within MT+ we identified two subregions. Putative area MST (pMST) was activated by ipsi- and contralateral stimulation and located in the anterior part of MT+. The second subregion was located in the more posterior part of MT+ (putative area MT, pMT)

    Chronic neuropsychiatric sequelae of SARS‐CoV‐2: Protocol and methods from the Alzheimer's Association Global Consortium

    Get PDF
    Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused >3.5 million deaths worldwide and affected >160 million people. At least twice as many have been infected but remained asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic. COVID-19 includes central nervous system manifestations mediated by inflammation and cerebrovascular, anoxic, and/or viral neurotoxicity mechanisms. More than one third of patients with COVID-19 develop neurologic problems during the acute phase of the illness, including loss of sense of smell or taste, seizures, and stroke. Damage or functional changes to the brain may result in chronic sequelae. The risk of incident cognitive and neuropsychiatric complications appears independent from the severity of the original pulmonary illness. It behooves the scientific and medical community to attempt to understand the molecular and/or systemic factors linking COVID-19 to neurologic illness, both short and long term. Methods This article describes what is known so far in terms of links among COVID-19, the brain, neurological symptoms, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. We focus on risk factors and possible molecular, inflammatory, and viral mechanisms underlying neurological injury. We also provide a comprehensive description of the Alzheimer's Association Consortium on Chronic Neuropsychiatric Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (CNS SC2) harmonized methodology to address these questions using a worldwide network of researchers and institutions. Results Successful harmonization of designs and methods was achieved through a consensus process initially fragmented by specific interest groups (epidemiology, clinical assessments, cognitive evaluation, biomarkers, and neuroimaging). Conclusions from subcommittees were presented to the whole group and discussed extensively. Presently data collection is ongoing at 19 sites in 12 countries representing Asia, Africa, the Americas, and Europe. Discussion The Alzheimer's Association Global Consortium harmonized methodology is proposed as a model to study long-term neurocognitive sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection

    Aging modifies the direction of the assumed light source

    No full text

    Averaging effects in spatial working memory do not depend on stored ensemble statistics

    No full text
    Recall from visual working memory shows averaging affects. For example, the recalled position of a memorised item is biased toward the average location of all items in a memory array. A recent suggestion is that averaging reflects an attempt to optimise single-item recall by exploiting ensemble statistics. This proposal predicts that the average location is memorised independently from that of individual items. We compared normal subjects� perceptual estimates of the centre of mass (COM) of three-stimulus dot arrays, COM from recall and single items from recall. Perceptual estimates of COM showed a systematic bias toward the array�s incenter, COM recall did not show this bias. The precision of COM recall was lower than COM perceptual estimates and higher than single item recall. In a right hemisphere patient with left hemianopia and neglect, COM perceptual estimates were systematically biased contralesionally, while COM recalls were biased ipsilesionally, confirming the dissociation between perception and recall. These findings suggest that COM is recalled by averaging the memorised items� positions rather than by retrieving its memorised perceptual estimate. Averaging in spatial recall may arise instead from a reference frame transformation, ensuring that the relative position of the item in the sample array is recalled

    Matching cue size and task properties in exogenous attention

    No full text
    Exogenous attention is an involuntary, reflexive orienting response that results in enhanced processing at the attended location. The standard view is that this enhancement generalizes across visual properties of a stimulus. We test whether the size of an exogenous cue sets the attentional field and whether this leads to different effects on stimuli with different visual properties. In a dual task with a random-dot kinematogram (RDK) in each quadrant of the screen, participants discriminated the direction of moving dots in one RDK and localized one red dot. Precues were uninformative and consisted of either a large or a small luminance-change frame. The motion discrimination task showed attentional effects following both large and small exogenous cues. The red dot probe localization task showed attentional effects following a small cue, but not a large cue. Two additional experiments showed that the different effects on localization were not due to reduced spatial uncertainty or suppression of RDK dots in the surround. These results indicate that the effects of exogenous attention depend on the size of the cue and the properties of the task, suggesting the involvement of receptive fields with different sizes in different tasks. These attentional effects are likely to be driven by bottom-up mechanisms in early visual areas

    Attention to multiple locations is limited by spatial working memory capacity

    No full text
    corecore